EPA Issues Draft Policy to Reduce Animal Testing for Skin Sensitization

November 01, 2018

EPA Issues Draft Policy to Reduce Animal Testing for Skin Sensitization

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released an industry draft Science Policy to reduce the use of animals in testing chemicals to evaluate whether they cause an allergic reaction, inflammation or sensitization of the skin. The draft policy was open for public comment until June 9, 2018.

EPA Issues Draft Policy to Reduce Animal Testing for Skin Sensitization
EPA Issues Draft Policy to Reduce Animal Testing
for Skin Sensitization

Non-animal Alternatives Available

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, said:
“This draft policy is another step toward achieving EPA's goal of reducing the use of animals and increasing the use of cutting-edge science in chemical testing.”

The document, Draft Interim Science Policy: Use of Alternative Approaches for Skin Sensitization as a Replacement for Laboratory Animal Testing, describes the science behind the non-animal alternatives that can now be used (in vitro, in silico, in chemico) to identify skin sensitization. EPA currently requires these data to support pesticide registrations.

Result of Collaboration

Given the substantial scientific evidence and international activities supporting the new methodologies for skin sensitization testing, EPA will begin accepting these approaches immediately under the conditions described in the draft policy document. This draft policy is the result of national and international collaboration between the following:
  • The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods
  • The National Toxicology Program’s Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods
  • The European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing
  • Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency

Another Milestone Fulfilled

Under Administrator Pruitt’s leadership, the Agency has made strides to overall reduce the use of animal testing. Last month, EPA fulfilled another milestone in the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, which amended the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), when it released a draft strategy to reduce or replace the use of vertebrate animals in tests of chemical substances manufactured, processed, or imported in the United States.


Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.


Also in MC2 BLOG

PARIS In the Big Beauty AI Research Game
PARIS In the Big Beauty AI Research Game

September 18, 2020

Big Beauty is getting into the AI research game. L’Oréal and Kering are amongst the five founding sponsors of the new Hi! Paris research centre, according to WWD.com.  The research centre has been supported by the Haute École de Commerce Paris and the Institut Polytechnique de Paris and focuses on artificial intelligence and data.

Read More

Natural -vs- Synthetic - Uncovering the Facts Part 1
Natural -vs- Synthetic - Uncovering the Facts Part 1

September 16, 2020

Everything is a chemical. Water is a chemical (H2O), vitamins are complex chemicals, simple, one ingredient herbal extracts are volatile complex chemicals, therefore there is no such thing as chemical-free products.  Although, there can be certified natural ingredients, those from plants are considered by scientists to be extremely volatile chemicals that are known allergens, disruptors and pose issues when formulating.

When nature meets science and science defines nature, we can find a harmony with which to move forward in natural product development.

Read More

Barrier Beauty ::: Repair On Duty
Barrier Beauty ::: Repair On Duty

August 17, 2020

The significance of the skin barrier today is relative to the amount of cleansing our skin experiences during current the Covid-19 flux in order to stay free of foreign toxicants.

Barrier damage can be caused by

  • suffocating skin tissue
  • over treating skin
  • over cleansing skin
  • scraping, pulling, stretching of the skin excessively

Read More